Tags
Advisor AIG Asset Management Auto Insurance B2B Basel III cash management Central Counterparties CFTC Compliance Consolidation Debit Dodd-Frank Dodd-Frank Act Durbin Amendment ETFs European Trading Fannie Mae FinReg Fraud Freddie Mac GSEs Healthcare HFT Insurance Interchange Investing Life Insurance M&A Malware Marketing Mobile Mobile Payments Mortgage P&C Insurance Payments Regulation Retail FX Risk Management SEC SEPA Social Media Supply Chain Finance Technology trade finance-
Authors
- Adam Honore
- Adil Moussa
- Alois Pirker
- Bob McDowall
- Christine Barry
- Christine Pratt
- Clark Troy
- Danielle Tierney
- David Albertazzi
- Denise Valentine
- Enrico Camerinelli
- Fritz McCormick
- Gwenn Bezard
- Howard Tai
- Javier Paz
- John Jay
- Julie Conroy McNelley
- Kunal Pandya
- Madeline Aufseeser
- Nancy Atkinson
- Paul Zubulake
- Philip Lawton
- Rick Oglesby
- Ron Shevlin
- Sang Lee
- Simmy Grewal
- Sophie Schmitt
- Stephen Applebaum
- Virginie O'Shea
Archives
Sharing the Pain: GSEs Look to Private MBS Investors for Help
Posted on October 28, 2011 byMid-October found the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) — the regulatory overseer of government-sponsored entities (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — and the Obama administration considering a limited pilot program that seeks greater private-investor participation through private purchases of first-loss positions in new GSE issuances of mortgage-backed securities (MBSs). This program does not require congressional approval, but it does require the FHFA to sign off. Fundamentally, this program is a risk-sharing arrangement that would allow GSEs to take losses only after the riskiest bonds in the capital structure (expected to be 5% to 10% in thickness) are first … Continue Reading
read comments(0)
Freddie Mac: When Taxpayers Get in the Way of Business
Posted on September 30, 2011 byThe Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, recently announced that Freddie Mac used faulty analytical methodologies relating to mortgage buybacks in its US$1.35 billion settlement with Bank of America. In effect, FHFA contends that Freddie Mac underestimated questionable 2005 to 2007 Countrywide-originated mortgages and did not take into account teaser-rate loans, whose credit risks differ from more traditional mortgage products. The FHFA senior examiner concluded that the settlement was inadequate and that Freddie Mac had done so in order to preserve its relationship with Bank of America, a large underwriter of loans used … Continue Reading
On Fannie/Freddie: Tossing the Baby?
Posted on February 28, 2011 byIn the recent rush to dismantle government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, it appears that those in charge (government advisors, senators, and the like) don’t quite understand some things — Fannie and Freddie, the U.S. banking landscape, and who is to blame for the mortgage fiasco. Scary thought. If you need a realistic example of government crisis competency, think about the auto workers’ union — what was, until a couple of years ago, a shining example of U.S.-based industry and the free enterprise system — or General Motors and Chrysler. And all GM and Chrysler wanted was to borrow … Continue Reading
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: The End of the Road?
Posted on February 15, 2011 byAs a response to the US$150 billion bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the U.S. Treasury Department has unveiled a proposed plan for the U.S. Congress to unwind the government-sponsored entities (GSEs). Through their relationship with the government, these GSEs were once able to provide lower-cost funding to homeowners than that which could be provided by the private sector. Unfortunately, this led to GSEs crowding out the private sector and commanding a disproportionate share of the overall mortgage market, eventually leaving the American public on the hook for losses. Until now, these GSEs served two masters: promoting housing in … Continue Reading


